Notarist Affairs Reviewed By Law And Notary Department
The purpose of this research is to find out whether the provisions in article 12 letter a of the Notary Office Law are not contrary to Law No. 37 of 2004 on bankruptcy related to on the basis of whether notaris can be dismissed from office if it has been decided bankrupt by pengadilan and the verdict has the force hukum fixed.. This research discusses about. apakah provisions in article 12 letter a of the Notary Office Lawdo not conflict with theLaw- Undang bankruptcy related to the dismissal of a notary public who has been declared bankrupt by the Minister.. This research uses Legal Certainty Theory and Justice Theory. This journal is a Normative Juridical research using Statutory Approach and Conceptual Approach. The result of writing this journal is that there is a discrepancy between the Act of pemberhentian Otaris Office and tentang Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy because the purpose and conduct of the law is different and the notary dismissal from office is irrelevant when reviewed from the theory of justice and legal certainty. kepastian According to article 12 letter a of the Notary Office Law, a notary public can be dishonorably discharged because it has been declared bankrupt based on a court decision that has obtained permanent legal force. This dishonrespect is a treatment that is in accordance with the concept of bankruptcy because the bankruptcy law itself regulates legal efforts to protect the interests of creditors stipulated in article 24 paragraph 1 of the Insolvency Act. There isno conflictbetween the two laws regarding therelevance of notary dismissal.
Fuady, Munir, Bankruptcy Law 1998 In Theory and Practice,PT. Aditya's Image of Bandung, 2002,
Department of Education and Culture, Dictionary of Indonesian Language,Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 1994.
G.H.S. Lumban Tobing, Notary Office Regulation,Erlangga, Jakarta, 1993.
Kiem Tan Thong, Studi Notariat & Serba-Serbi Notary Practice Study, Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve,Jakarta, 2011.
Lontoh, Rudy, etal., Settlement of Receivables Through Pailit or Postponement of Debt PaymentObligations, Alumni, Bandung, 2001. dkk
Mertokusumo, Sudikno and A. Pitlo, Chapters on The Invention of Law,Citra Aditya Bakti, Yogyakarta, 1993.
Patrik, Purwahid and Kashadi, Bail Law,Revised Edition with UUHT,Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 1998.
Pramono, Nindyo, Law of Bankruptcy and Justice of Pancasila,Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2017.
Rato, Dominikus, Philosophy of Law: An Introduction to Finding, Findingand Understanding theLaw, Laksbang Justitia, Surabaya, 2014.Subhan, Hadi, Bankruptcy Law and Pancasila Justice,Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2017.
Hadi Subhan, Bankruptcy Law, Principles, Norms and Practices in the Judiciary,KencanaPrenada Media, Jakarta, 2008.
Notodisoerjo, Soegondo, Notariat Law in Indonesia An Explanation,Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 1982.
Sjaifurrahman and Habib Adjie, Aspects of Notary Accountability in the Making ofDeed, Mandar Madju, Bandung, 2011.
Sutedi, Adrian, Bankruptcy Law,Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2009.
Utrecht, E., Introduction to Indonesian Administrative Law,SixthPrinting, Ichtiar, Jakarta, 1963.
Yani, Ahmad & Gunawan Widjaja, Bankruptcy Business Law Series,PT Raja Grafindo Perkasa, Jakarta, 2002.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.