Notarist Affairs Reviewed By Law And Notary Department

  • Filianty Filianty Faculty of Law, Narotama University Surabaya
  • Habib Adjie Faculty of Law, Narotama University Surabaya
Keywords: Notary bankruptcy, notary dismissal, singkronization of laws

Abstract

The  purpose of this research is to find out whether the provisions in article 12 letter a of the Notary Office Law are not contrary to Law No. 37 of 2004       on bankruptcy related to on the basis of whether notaris can be dismissed from office if it has been decided bankrupt   by pengadilan  and  the verdict has the force hukum  fixed.. This  research discusses about. apakah provisions in article 12 letter a of the Notary Office Lawdo not conflict with theLaw- Undang bankruptcy related to the dismissal  of a notary  public who  has been declared bankrupt by the Minister.. This research  uses Legal Certainty Theory and Justice Theory. This journal is a  Normative  Juridical research using Statutory Approach and Conceptual Approach. The result of writing this   journal is that there is a discrepancy between the Act of  pemberhentian  Otaris   Office and tentang Law No.  37  of  2004 on Bankruptcy because the purpose and conduct of the law  is different and the notary dismissal from  office is irrelevant when  reviewed    from  the theory  of  justice and  legal  certainty. kepastian  According to article 12 letter a of the Notary Office Law, a notary public can be dishonorably discharged because it has been declared bankrupt based on a court decision that has obtained permanent legal force. This dishonrespect is a treatment that is in accordance with the concept of bankruptcy because the bankruptcy law itself regulates legal efforts to protect the interests of creditors stipulated in article 24 paragraph 1 of the Insolvency Act. There isno conflictbetween the two laws regarding therelevance of  notary  dismissal.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjie, Habib, Notary Law in Indonesia (Thematic Interpretation of Law No. 2 of 2014 on Amendment to Law No. 30 of 2004 on Notary Position),Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2015.
Fuady, Munir, Bankruptcy Law 1998 In Theory and Practice,PT. Aditya's Image of Bandung, 2002,
Department of Education and Culture, Dictionary of Indonesian Language,Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 1994.
G.H.S. Lumban Tobing, Notary Office Regulation,Erlangga, Jakarta, 1993.
Kiem Tan Thong, Studi Notariat & Serba-Serbi Notary Practice Study, Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve,Jakarta, 2011.
Lontoh, Rudy, etal., Settlement of Receivables Through Pailit or Postponement of Debt PaymentObligations, Alumni, Bandung, 2001. dkk
Mertokusumo, Sudikno and A. Pitlo, Chapters on The Invention of Law,Citra Aditya Bakti, Yogyakarta, 1993.
Patrik, Purwahid and Kashadi, Bail Law,Revised Edition with UUHT,Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 1998.
Pramono, Nindyo, Law of Bankruptcy and Justice of Pancasila,Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2017.
Rato, Dominikus, Philosophy of Law: An Introduction to Finding, Findingand Understanding theLaw, Laksbang Justitia, Surabaya, 2014.Subhan, Hadi, Bankruptcy Law and Pancasila Justice,Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2017.
Hadi Subhan, Bankruptcy Law, Principles, Norms and Practices in the Judiciary,KencanaPrenada Media, Jakarta, 2008.
Notodisoerjo, Soegondo, Notariat Law in Indonesia An Explanation,Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 1982.
Sjaifurrahman and Habib Adjie, Aspects of Notary Accountability in the Making ofDeed, Mandar Madju, Bandung, 2011.
Sutedi, Adrian, Bankruptcy Law,Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2009.
Utrecht, E., Introduction to Indonesian Administrative Law,SixthPrinting, Ichtiar, Jakarta, 1963.
Yani, Ahmad & Gunawan Widjaja, Bankruptcy Business Law Series,PT Raja Grafindo Perkasa, Jakarta, 2002.
Published
2021-03-30
How to Cite
Filianty, F., & Adjie, H. (2021, March 30). Notarist Affairs Reviewed By Law And Notary Department. YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 17(3), 238-252. Retrieved from https://yurisdiksi.org/index.php/yurisdiksi/article/view/105
Section
Articles