Government Responsibility for Troubled Land Rights Lawsuit

  • Moh. Imron Fauzi Hidayatullah Faculty of Law, Narotama University Surabaya
  • Nynda Fatmawati Octarina Faculty of Law, Narotama University, Surabaya
Keywords: Responsibility, Lawsuit, Government, Rights

Abstract

Land registration in Indonesia adheres to a mixed system, a negative system with a positive tendency, meaning that the state does not guarantee the absolute truth of the data presented in the certificate, but as long as no one else filed a lawsuit in court who felt more entitled, so the data in the certificate was proof of strong rights. This research is a non-analytic normative juridical study, the theoretical basis used is the level of normative / contemplative legal theory, the approach in this research is the statute approach. The analysis used is qualitative juridical analysis, namely by collecting and collecting material material, then arranged in a particular framework, then analyzed according to the means of analysis by interpreting the law, legal construction, and legal arguments. From the results of the discussion it was concluded: 1) the lawsuit is judicially premature. The police report cannot be used as a basis for filing a quo lawsuit before obtaining a permanent legal judgment. 2) Lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff less parties (plurium litis consortium), and Lawsuit cannot be accepted (niet ontvankelijk verklaard). 3) The Plaintiff has never owned land that was the Object of the Plaintiff I. The Plaintiff has never owned two land which became Object Plaintiff II but the Plaintiff has signed a power of attorney and a sale and purchase certificate to release ownership of the two land areas. 4) Government Regulation No. 24/1997 introduces the principle of legal certainty as regulated in Article 32 which reflects the shift in the system adopted by land registration in Indonesia from negative system to negative system plus Government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Ghofur Ansori, (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. UII Press, Yogyakarta
Boedi Harsono, (2007). Hukum Agraria Indonesia Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya Jilid I Hukum Tanah Nasional, Djambatan, Jakarta.
Diantha, I. Made Pasek, (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Prenada Media, Jakarta.
Efendi, Jonaedi and Johnny Ibrahim, (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta.
Gilarso,(2004) T. Pengantar ilmu ekonomi makro. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
H. Purwosusilo, (2017). Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Prenada Media, Jakarta.
Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian. Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2019.
Jumroh, Kalimatul dan Ade Kosasih, (2019). Pengembalian Aset Negara Dari Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Undang-Undang tentang Pemberantasan Korupsi dan United Nation Convention Against Corruption 2003). CV. Zigie Utama, Bengkulu.
M. Yahya Harahap, (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, penerbit Sinar Grafika, cetakan Ketiga, 2005.
Rahmatullah, Indra, (2015). Aset Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan dalam Perbankan. Deepublish, Yogyakarta.
Soedargo Gautama, (1993). Tafsiran Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Bandung, Alumni.
Supianto,(2015). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia: Prinsip Publisitas pada Jaminan Fidusia. Penerbit Garudhawaca, Jakarta.
Zen, A. Patra M., dan Daniel Hutagalung, (2007). Panduan Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia: pedoman anda memahami dan menyelesaikan masalah hukum. Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Jakarta.
Published
2020-06-27
How to Cite
Fauzi Hidayatullah, M. I., & Fatmawati Octarina, N. (2020, June 27). Government Responsibility for Troubled Land Rights Lawsuit. YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 1(1), 38-50. Retrieved from http://yurisdiksi.org/index.php/yurisdiksi/article/view/64