Criminal Appropriation From Money Laundering And Corruption Crime

  • Andy Rachman Faculty of Law, University Airlangga
  • R. Bayu Probo S Faculty of Law, University Airlangga
  • Aditya Budi Susetyo Faculty of Law, University Airlangga
  • Inal Sainal Saiful Faculty of Law, University Airlangga
Keywords: Criminal Appropriation, Money Laundering, Corruption Crime

Abstract

The rampant criminal acts of corruption in the country have not only affected the country's finances but have violated the social and economic rights of the people, corruption is no longer a national problem, so it has become a transnational phenomenon to eradicate it. The difficulty in eradicating criminal acts of corruption, including money laundering (money laundering), is because our legal norms are still very dependent on the Criminal Procedure Act (KUHAP), the principle of which is the acusatoir principle, including the principle that can be guessed or accused as a topic related to an examination trial case. The freedom of giving and obtaining legal freedom that governs shows the principle of acusatoir, which means the difference between preliminary hearings and court hearings on the principle has been eliminated. After the entry into force of the Criminal Procedure Code, the rights of the suspect are questioned. This is because whoever indicted, namely the prosecutor, is he who is obliged to prove the indictment. Authority of the Prosecutor's Office in the field of prosecution and education for special crimes, based on Article 30 paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 Year 2004 concerning the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office, namely: courts for and on behalf of the state or government

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amos H.F, Abraham. 2007. Legal Opinion Teoritis & Empirisme, Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
I.P.M. Ranuhandoko. 2003. Terminologi Hukum Inggris - Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, Cetakan Ketiga.
Mulyadi, Lilik. 2009. Pergeseran Perspektif dan Praktek Dari Mahkamah Agung mengenai Putusan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Mujahidin, Ahmad. 2012. Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
Purwaning. M. Yanuar. 2007. Pengenmbalian Aset Hasil Korupsi, PT. Alumni, Bandung.
Rihantoro Bayuaji. 2019. Hukum Pidana Korupsi Prinsip Hukum Perampasan Aset Koruptor Dalam Prespektif Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, LaksBang Justitia, Jakarta.
Suhartoyo. 2019. Argumen Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Sebagai Metode Prioritas Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Supardi. 2018. Perampasan Harta Hasil Korupsi “Prespektif Hukum Pidana Yang Berkeadilan”, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.


Statutory Regulations
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 31 tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 Tentang Keuangan Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.
Published
2020-06-27
How to Cite
Rachman, A., Probo S, R. B., Budi Susetyo, A., & Saiful, I. S. (2020, June 27). Criminal Appropriation From Money Laundering And Corruption Crime. YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 1(1), 1-17. Retrieved from http://yurisdiksi.org/index.php/yurisdiksi/article/view/62