Digitalization of Notary Deeds In The Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 In Facing The Covid-19 Pandemic
purpose of this research is first, to analyze the digitization of deeds and notary deeds that do not conflict with the Law on Notary Position. Second, to analyze legal certainty in changing the behavior of notaries who use digital media in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 and facing the Covid-19 pandemic when making and storing minimum deeds. This research uses normative legal research methods. This research concludes, firstly: Notary deed and minuta deed are very important state documents, so that in their storage the Notary is obliged to maintain and safeguard them properly, regulated in UUJN Article 1 point 13. Storage of Notary deed minuta documents using electronic media has not been regulated in UUJN, however, Article 6 of the ITE Law considers the validity of an electronic document, even though the evidence according to Article 1866 of the Criminal Code and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not explain the existence of electronic evidence, in which a notary deed is an authentic deed in accordance with UUJN Article 1 point 1. Second: Changes in the work behavior of Notaries In the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 and facing the Covid-19 pandemic, the creation and storage of digital notary deeds requires certainty and protection from the Government and the Indonesian Notary Association (INI). Digitalization as a form of notary adhering to health protocols and protection for minimum notary deeds from damage caused by natural disasters, fire and being eaten by termites and excess space.
Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP)
Edmon Makarim. (2018). Notary and Electronic Transactions, Rajawali Pers, Depok.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2005). Revised Edition of Legal Research, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.
Edison H Manurung. (2019). The Role of Law and Challenges of Law Enforcement in Facing the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, Faculty of Engineering, Mpu Tantular University, Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 130-131.
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rev Revolusi_Industri_4.0, accessed Tuesday, 24 November 2020, at 20:22software/69-pengentuk-database.html.
https://www.termasmedia.com/ other/, accessed on Friday , 27 November 2020, 23.25
https://qwords.com/blog/komponen-basis-data/, accessed on Friday, 27 November 2020, at 00.00.
https://www.linovhr.com/tugas-it-support/, accessed on Friday, 27 November 2020, at 11:48 p.m.
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandemi#cite_note-Porta2008-3, accessed on Friday, 04 December 2020, at 22:37.
https://covid19.go.id/edukasi/ introduction / introduction, accessed Saturday, December 5, 2020, at 02.20benefits/#:~:Social%
Johnny Ibrahim in Reza Ardiyanto and Moh. Pious. (2020). Juridical Implication of Falsification of Signature in Minutes of Deed of Notary Position (Study of the Supreme Court's Decision Number 1234 K / Pid / 2012), Faculty of Law, Narotama University, Vol. 16 No. 1, p. 4.
Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.
No. Invite- Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public.
Mareta Fauziah,text=20distancing%20sself https://campuspedia.id/news/social-distancing-ini-arti-dan-% 20 has% 20% 20% 20% 20 very% 20 diverse., Direct% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20 avoid% 20% 20 disease, accessed Monday, 07 December 2020, 23.38
Philipus M. Hadjon. (1997). About Authority, Yuridika Monthly Paper No. 5-6 Year XII September - December, Airlangga University, Surabaya.
Ridwan HR (2006). State Administrative Law, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
SF. Marbun. (1997). State Administrative Courts and Administrative Efforts in Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.